Make IR interest, late payment penalties disappear

A missed or underpaid provisional tax payment often means a taxpayer is faced with a steep interest cost and potentially late payment penalties on top of what they owe.

However, tax pooling can make that go away.

A big frustration with Inland Revenue (IR) is that it expects taxpayers to pay the correct amount of tax on the dates it sets. No ifs, no buts.

Fail to adhere to this rigid timetable or underpay and you will face the consequences.

IR charges interest – 10.91% as at 7 August 2024 – from the date the payment was due until you pay the outstanding amount.

Late payment penalties may also apply as follows:

  • One percent the day after payment was due.
  • An additional four percent if the tax amount (including late payment penalties) remains unpaid after seven days.

A tax pooling provider such as TMNZ operates with the blessing of IR. It can be of assistance if taxpayers find themselves in this situation.

Where might this be useful?

In the event you missed your recent 7 May provisional tax payment – or any other instalment relating to the 2020-21 income year, for that matter – we can eliminate any late payment penalties for which you may be liable and significantly reduce the interest you pay.

You make your payment to TMNZ and we apply backdated tax that was paid to IR on the original date(s) it was due against your liability.

The taxman treats it as if you paid on time once it processes this transaction.

This wipes any IR interest and late payment penalties showing on your account.

You have the option of making to TMNZ a one-off payment at a date of your choosing or making regular instalment payments towards your liability over a longer period.

TMNZ gives you up to 13 months to pay your 7 May provisional tax for the 2020-21 income year.

Is your 2020 terminal tax overdue?

You still have time to use TMNZ to reduce the interest cost and eliminate late payment penalties if you have outstanding provisional or terminal tax liabilities for the 2019-20 income year.

However, you will have to act quickly.

Tax pooling legislation gives taxpayers an additional 75 days past their terminal tax date to pay their terminal tax.

If your terminal tax for the 2019-20 income year was due on 7 April 2021, you would have until 15 June to settle owe with TMNZ.

Reassessed by IR

TMNZ can also assist with historic income tax payments and other tax types such as GST and PAYE if you receive a notice of reassessment from IR.

You have 60 days from the date the IR issues this notice to use tax pooling.

Please contact us if you have any questions.


Commissioner’s discretion for tax pooling

A provision within legislation allows taxpayers to use tax pooling for certain income tax or RWT voluntary disclosures where no return has been previously filed.

This is known as Commissioner’s discretion.

And it’s worth seeking if a taxpayer satisfies all relevant criteria (see below), as settling these underpaid tax types through an approved tax pooling provider such as TMNZ can result in notable interest savings. The interest we charge can be significantly lower than Inland Revenue (IR).

To use tax pooling for historical income tax and other tax types, there generally needs to be a notice of reassessment issued by IR.

However, section RP17B (9) Income Tax Act 2007 stipulates that the Commissioner’s discretion found in RP17B (10) of the Act may be available in situations where a voluntary disclosure for income tax or RWT is made and a return for that tax type has not previously been filed.

The criteria for Commissioner’s discretion

That said, there are three conditions a taxpayer seeking Commissioner’s discretion to use tax pooling funds to settle income tax and RWT obligations must meet.

They are as follows:

  • The increased amount arises as a result of an event or circumstance beyond the person’s control; and
  • The person has a reasonable justification or excuse for not filing the return by the required date; and
  • The person has an otherwise good compliance history for two income years before the income year in which the voluntary disclosure is made.

A taxpayer must satisfy all three requirements for the Commissioner to exercise their discretion.

This ensures that in exercising discretion she is satisfied that each occasion of non-compliance is not a deliberate act or a continuation of failures because of the taxpayer’s inadequate or poorly applied internal controls.

We recommend you refer to the examples 12 and 13 (pages 44 and 45) of the Tax Information Bulletin Vol 23, No 8, October 2011 to get a sense of the scenarios where IR will allow or decline a request for Commissioner’s discretion.

Applying for Commissioner’s discretion

The process is straightforward.

An application asking the Commissioner to exercise their discretion to use tax pooling funds can be made in writing.

Be sure to include the taxpayer’s name and IR number in this correspondence.

Outline the details of the case in a few paragraphs. We recommend splitting this information under the following headings:

  • Background information. Include information about the taxpayer and nature of their business. It should also contain contextual information that you deem relevant, such as historical business relationships, personal circumstances, and relationships with other/historical accountants.
  • The increased amount arises as a result of an event or circumstance beyond the person's control. Include detailed (and chronological) events or factors that have occurred throughout the period in question that provide further contextual explanation as to how the liability has arisen and not been declared until now, and how this was beyond the taxpayer’s control.
  • The person has a reasonable justification or excuse for not filing the return by the required date. Include any details that show the client has not been purposefully negligent.
  • The person has an otherwise good compliance history for two income years before the income year in which the voluntary disclosure is made. Include details that support a good prior history. It’s important to show this occurrence is out of the ordinary and therefore worthy of consideration.

TMNZ has an email template available should you require this.

Requests asking the Commissioner to exercise their discretion can be sent to taxpooling@ird.govt.nz

TMNZ is here to help

If you’d like further information on Commissioner’s discretion or wish to discuss a particular scenario, please get in touch.


Image: Anti-money laundering

Anti-money laundering requirements and tax pooling

Tax Management NZ (TMNZ) must now conduct a limited form of customer due diligence on all clients as part of recent changes to anti-money laundering (AML) requirements.

As such, we will be collecting information about the taxpayers using our service and asking anyone acting on their behalf to supply some basic personal details.

We also need to see evidence that a taxpayer has an actual or expected liability at Inland Revenue (IR) before we transfer tax from our tax pool.

Transactions cannot be completed until we receive this information from you.

Information we require from a taxpayer

For a company, limited AML requires us to collect and hold information about them that is publicly available. We will obtain this information ourselves from the New Zealand Companies Office. You don’t have to do this.

For an individual or a trust, we only need information from a person acting on their behalf (see below).

What person acting on behalf means

As part of the limited AML requirement, TMNZ must collect the identity information from at least one individual who has the authority to act on behalf of a taxpayer using our service.

For tax agents, this can be either of the following:

  • A partner, director or owner of your firm; or
  • An agent at your firm who is linked to the taxpayer (e.g. the taxpayer’s accountant). It can also include the person who entered the transaction for the taxpayer or the person who receives email correspondence regarding the taxpayer’s transaction if this person is different from the accountant.

For a taxpayer, this can be ANY of the following:

  • The taxpayer themselves, if they are an individual.
  • An employee who has authority to act on behalf of the taxpayer (if they are a company).
  • A trustee of the taxpayer (if they are a trust). We require a copy of the trust deed to ensure this person has authority to act.

The person above requires a TMNZ dashboard login and must either have visibility to view all taxpayers registered with your accounting firm or be linked to the specific taxpayer or transaction. This is not applicable if the taxpayer is an individual or the person acting on behalf is a trustee.

You have the option of supplying the tax agent or taxpayer identity information as part of limited AML.

Identity information we require from a person acting on behalf

TMNZ must collect the following identity information as part of the limited AML requirement if you are a person acting on behalf of the taxpayer:

  • Your full legal name.
  • Date of birth.

The above is required under section 15 Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009.

Any personal information TMNZ holds about you or your clients is stored on a secure system that has been penetration tested to ensure this data will not be compromised.

Confirmation of tax liability

The limited AML requirement means TMNZ must also ascertain that a taxpayer using our service has a liability or expects to have a liability with IR before we can complete their transaction.

Proof of this can be in the form of:

  • Written confirmation from a tax agent that the taxpayer is expecting to have a liability at IR. (This can be an approximation if the exact figure is not known at the time.)
  • A copy of the taxpayer’s myIR transaction detail report for the relevant tax year.
  • Standard uplift amounts determined from prior year RIT information. Prior year RIT information must be determined from copies of IR correspondence or written confirmation from a tax agent.
  • A copy of any provisional tax estimate submitted to IR by the taxpayer.
  • Any correspondence from IR showing a liability to pay in respect to the relevant tax year.

We only require confirmation of a taxpayer’s liability when we transfer funds from the tax pool to their IR account.

Does the information provided need to be verified?

A partial exemption granted to the tax pooling industry means there is no need for TMNZ to carry out the verification requirements that apply under full AML.

In other words, we do not need you to provide copies of documents to substantiate the information you provide.

Full AML, including verification, is still required for refunds or sales that meet our policy thresholds.

AML has been around for a long time – why are you asking for this information now?

Previously, TMNZ only carried out AML if a taxpayer was requesting a refund or sale over a certain amount from the tax pool.

However, our AML regulator – the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) – is making tax pooling providers hold more information about every taxpayer using our service and anyone with authority to act on their behalf.

This limited AML requirement from DIA is in response to the accounting profession being brought into the AML regime. It has been in effect since 1 July 2020.

As a reporting entity captured under the Act, TMNZ must comply with the AML regulations set out in the legislation and any other requirements issued by DIA.

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions. We’re happy to help.

Updated 12 October 2020

Disclaimer: This article is correct as at 12 October 2020. It is subject to change.


How filing late and losing EOT impacts provisional tax payments

Losing extension of time (EOT) due to filing income tax returns late means someone can only use 105 percent of the previous year's residual income tax (RIT) when calculating their provisional tax payments.

That's because if a taxpayer fails to provide their returns(s) on time, Inland Revenue's (IR) system defaults to using the date by which they were legally due to file the return for that year – not the date on which they furnished the return.

Only if someone files their return(s) within the required timeframe will the actual date of filing be used.

This is important to remember, particularly when using TMNZ’s Tax Calculator.

An overview of IR's system and TMNZ's Tax Calculator

When a taxpayer files their return for the most recently completed year, IR’s system uses the lesser of standard uplift or a third of their RIT to determine the provisional tax instalment amounts due and payable for that year.

As per s120KBB (3B) Tax Administration Act 1994, the standard uplift instalment can either be the lesser of the 105 percent or 110 percent calculation. You can read more about that here.

TMNZ’s calculator follows the same logic as IR's system.

To determine the instalment amounts due and payable, it requires a taxpayer's RIT and filing date information for the past three years:

  • The current tax year or most recently completed tax year (e.g. 2020).
  • The tax year prior to that (e.g. 2019).
  • The tax year two years prior to that (e.g. 2018).

Whereas IR has access to this information, we unfortunately don't. That's why we ask users to enter these details themselves.

If someone was late in providing a return and lost their EOT in any of the years before the current or recently completed tax year, then it’s crucial they know the correct filing date to use, otherwise the calculator will spit out incorrect instalment amounts.

After all, garbage in, garbage out.

Example

A taxpayer with a 31 March balance date decided to use TMNZ’s Tax Calculator to work out the provisional tax payable for the 2019 tax year. They did not pay any income tax for that year and wanted to purchase it from TMNZ to reduce their interest cost and eliminate late payment penalties.

RIT and filing date information for the past three years
Tax Year RIT EOT Legal date by which they must file their return Date they file their return Return status
2017 $6000 Yes 31 March 2018 1 May 2018 Late
2018 $10,000 No 7 July 2018 16 January 2019 Late
2019 $25,000 No 7 July 2019 30 June 2019 On time

As you can see, the taxpayer has lost their EOT for the 2018 tax year due to filing their 2017 return late. Their 2018 return was also late, so they don’t have EOT for their 2019 tax year either. However, the taxpayer did file the latter year’s return on time.

This means when using TMNZ’s Tax Calculator they must enter into the ‘date of filing’ field the respective legal dates by which they were required to furnish the returns for the 2017 and 2018 tax years.

For the 2017 tax year, this will be 31 March 2018 as their EOT was still applicable. For the 2018 tax year, this will be the non-EOT deadline of 7 July 2018.

Legislation states anyone who has an early balance date (i.e., the period between 1 October and 31 March) must file their return by 7 July if they do not have EOT. Those without EOT who have a late balance date (i.e., the period between 1 April and 30 September) must file their return on the seventh day of the fourth month after their year-end.

As the 2019 tax return was provided within the mandatory timeframe, the taxpayer can use the actual date on which they submitted that year’s return to IR.

Recap: How things should look in TMNZ’s Tax Calculator
Tax year RIT Date of filing
2017 $6000 31 March 2018
2018 $10,000 7 July 2018
2019 $25,000 30 June 2019

How this impacts provisional tax instalments

In this situation, the 2019 provisional tax instalments will be based on the standard uplift amount as this is lower than a third of the RIT for that year.

However, ALL uplift payments will be based on 105 percent of the 2018 RIT.

That’s because the taxpayer lost EOT for the 2018 tax year and, therefore, was supposed to have filed their return for that year on 7 July 2018 – before the date of their first provisional tax instalment for the 2019 tax year (this being 28 August 2018).

As such, they cannot base any payments off 110 percent of their 2017 RIT.

Therefore, the 2019 instalment amounts due and payable as per IR's system – and what TMNZ's Tax Calculator will tell them to purchase – at each date are as follows:

  • 28 August 2018: $3500
  • 15 January 2019: $3500
  • 7 May 2019: $3500

TMNZ's calculator will also show the taxpayer needs to purchase at their terminal tax date the final balance of $14,500 to settle the 2019 RIT, as their RIT is less than $60,000.

Please note the terminal tax date will have been 7 February 2020 due to them losing their EOT. They would have had 75 days from this date to purchase from TMNZ the 2019 income tax they require.

Don't forget the flow-on effect

It is also important to remember that because there was a requirement to file the 2019 return by 7 July 2019, the taxpayer can only use the 105 percent uplift calculation for their 2020 provisional tax payments.

Again, this is due to the filing date for the 2019 return being before the first instalment date for the 2020 year.

So, using the RIT information above, the standard uplift payments for the 2020 tax year will have been:

  • 28 August 2019: $8750
  • 15 January 2020: $8750
  • 7 May 2020: $8750

For those using the standard uplift method, the 105 percent calculation will continue to be the only option for them to determine provisional tax payments until the taxpayer re-applies for their EOT.

Legislative references

You can find the legislation pertaining to filing dates of tax returns and EOT in s37 and s38 Tax Administration Act 1994.

Please feel welcome to contact us if you have any questions.


Coffee with Tsarina at Shore Accounting Solutions

Tax pooling is part of the strategy Shore Accounting Solutions employs to assist businesses with managing cashflow and provisional tax payments.

Tsarina Dellow is a chartered accountant at the two-person firm in Amberley, 45 minutes north of Christchurch.

She says paying provisional tax on dates Inland Revenue (IR) prescribes can be hard on small- and medium-sized businesses’ cashflow. That’s particularly the case during the January to May period, when the department awaits payment of two provisional tax instalments (not to mention GST).

Xero’s Small Business Insights reveal January and May are two of the most difficult months in terms of cashflow. August is another. (See a pattern here?)

Tsarina says business owners can come unstuck in this period – particularly if they’re guilty of not squirreling cash away throughout the year.

“Kiwis are often quite bad at saving. They’re not very good at putting money away in the good times, so when they have a bit of a bump – maybe a customer pays late or a supplier puts their costs up – they don’t often have that buffer there. When you don’t have that buffer, things start to go downhill and it gets really stressful for people really, really fast.”

Enter TMNZ

As an IR-approved tax pooling provider, TMNZ allows businesses to make their provisional tax payments when it suits them.

There is no need to worry about late payment penalties. And the interest it charges is fairer than what IR charges when they miss a payment.

Tsarina mentions this service to clients when discussing tax planning and cashflow management if she notices they’re going to encounter any difficulty at certain times of the year.

“If [TMNZ] can help them out with that, we can set a programme in place to even things out during the year,” she says.

“It delivers excellent benefits for people’s cashflow. They’re able to pay their tax as and when it suits them and their business – and they don’t have to worry about the IR always chasing them up. If they can’t meet a provisional tax payment, they can hand it over to TMNZ and pay it when they can.”

About Shore Accounting Solutions

Tsarina has been working at Shore Accounting Solutions for four years. Her colleague Ben Shore founded the firm in 2012.

The duo is big on providing great, technical tax advice and helping North Canterbury businesses and the community grow.


Standard uplift: When 105 percent uplift payments are less than 110 percent payments

Inland Revenue (IR) will sometimes apply the 105 percent standard uplift calculation (CY-1) retrospectively when determining what's due and payable at each provisional tax instalment.

This happens in situations where CY-1 payments turn out to be less than 110 percent uplift payments (CY-2).

When this is the case, IR's system will automatically overwrite the CY-2 calculation once a taxpayer files their return for the previous year.

It will apply what's payable as per the CY-1 calculation to any earlier instalment(s) prior to the date of filing that return. See below.

Example - uplift instalments for 2020 tax year when 105 percent is less than 110 percent
A taxpayer with a 31 March balance date with the following information:

2018 RIT: $35,000
2019 RIT: $22,000 – accountant files the return for this year on 3 February 2020

The standard uplift payments due and payable for the 2020 tax year are as follows:

28 Aug 19: $7700
15 Jan 20: $7700
7 May 20: $7700

TMNZ’s Provisional Tax Calculator also applies this logic when taxpayers enter their residual income tax (RIT) and filing date information.

As you can see, this benefits standard uplift taxpayers.

What if 105 percent is GREATER THAN 110 percent?

When this applies, uplift can be calculated based on the lower CY-2 amount for any instalment(s) due prior to the date the previous year’s return is filed.

This is based on the premise that a taxpayer cannot pay an amount they do not know about and ensures they are not significantly underpaid based on their total uplift amount.

Example - uplift instalments for 2020 tax year when 105 percent is GREATER THAN 110 percent
A taxpayer with a 31 March balance date with the following information:

2018 RIT: $0
2019 RIT: $30,000 – accountant files the return for this year on 3 February 2020

The standard uplift payments due and payable for the 2020 tax year are as follows:
28 Aug 19: $0
15 Jan 20: $0
7 May 20: $31,500

Legislative change to reflect this approach to standard uplift

IR's legal team feels the legislation is not clear in regards to overwriting CY-2 with CY-1 when the latter is lower. As such, there is an amendment in the Taxation (Kiwisaver, Student Loans, and Remedial Matters) Bill that will align the legislation with what the department is doing operationally.

The Bill is due to have its second reading.

Please feel free to contact TMNZ if you have any questions about this.

Be sure to download our free guide on calculating provisional tax using the standard uplift method if you haven't done so.


Don't let 15 January provisional tax cause stress

Paying 15 January provisional tax can be stressful and a pain in the derrière for many businesses – but it doesn’t have to be.

There is an IR-approved service that allows taxpayers to make this payment when it suits them.

To understand why this might appeal, one must understand why 15 January provisional tax can be problematic.

For starters, let’s look at the timing of this payment. It is due when folks are enjoying the beach, BBQs, the bach or the boat. As the weather gets warmer, business activity for some chills during at this time of the year.

And while the current interest concession rules for taxpayers using the standard uplift method to calculate their provisional tax payments means they now have greater certainty over the amount due, this concession fails to recognise one thing that may be an issue for some during the Christmas-early New Year period: Cashflow.

Xero’s small business insights are telling. Only 39 percent of respondents were cashflow positive in January 2019. Moreover, invoices were also paid on average almost 11 days late during that month.

For some, the Christmas-early New Year period may mean six to eight weeks of no money coming in.

Pay 15 January provisional tax when it suits you

An IR-approved tax pooling provider such as TMNZ offers provisional taxpayers payment flexibility, without having to worry about Inland Revenue (IR) interest and late payment penalties.

A taxpayer entering a payment arrangement with a tax pooling provider has the option of paying what they owe in instalments or deferring payment of the full amount to a date in the future that better suits them.

Approval is guaranteed, and no security is required.

How does it work?

The tax pooling provider makes a deposit into its IR account on behalf of a taxpayer on the date their provisional tax payment is due (e.g. 15 January 2020). This deposit is date stamped as at the date it is made.

A taxpayer then goes about paying the tax pooling provider the core tax.

If they pay the full amount of tax owing, the tax pooling provider will transfer the entire deposit it is holding in its IR account on behalf of that taxpayer to the taxpayer’s IR account.

As this deposit carries a date stamp as at the date it was made, IR will recognise it as if the taxpayer paid their 15 January provisional tax on time once it processes this transfer. This will eliminate any IR interest and late payment penalties.

If the taxpayer opts to pay what they owe in instalments, the tax pooling provider transfers to the taxpayer’s IR account an amount of the date-stamped tax deposit that matches the amount of every part payment they make until they satisfy their liability.

IR will remit all interest and late payment penalties once the taxpayer pays the full amount owing.

What is the cost?

The taxpayer has some interest to pay – but this is cheaper than what IR charges when a taxpayer misses or underpays 15 January provisional tax.

Generally, it’s also less than a taxpayer’s existing finance rates.

A taxpayer choosing to finance the full payment of 15 January provisional tax to a later date will pay a fixed interest cost up front.

This is because they are agreeing to pay what they owe at an agreed upon date in the future.

The interest cost is based on the tax amount due and the date in the future they wish to pay.

Interest works a little differently if a taxpayer chooses to pay in instalments. The tax pooling provider will recalculate its interest on the core tax remaining at the end of each month.

How it compares to your other 15 January options

Another possibility is setting up a payment plan with IR.

However, as part of this process, you will need to supply financial information and details around the timeframe you expect to settle your liability. IR interest will continue to apply during any arrangement you strike.

You could also consider a short-term bank loan if cashflow issues will make paying 15 January provisional tax problematic. Again, there’s a process to go through and certain lending criteria must be met.

What you can do now

No doubt you are doing everything between now and when jolly ol' Santa rides into town on his present-laden sleigh to make sure you have enough funds to make ends meet if you feel the Christmas-early New Year period is going to be tough.

That probably means the usual jazz: preparing a budget, prioritising jobs you can complete quickly, chasing up anyone who owes you money and seeing if you can buy more time with creditors. Every dollar counts, right?

We have more tips in our free guide Better Cashflow Management that you might also find useful.

Now is also the opportune time to seek professional advice if, after doing a forecast, you feel you may encounter some strife. A good advisor will work with you to ensure a potential holiday cashflow issue does not become a crisis and help you manage your 15 January provisional tax payment.


Image: Walker & Co Real Estate owners Lee And Marc Walker

Walker & Co Real Estate remedy big provisional tax problem

Provisional tax is not without its challenges. Marc and Lee Walker from Walker & Co Real Estate know this all too well.

The husband and wife duo do not take umbrage at paying tax. No siree Bob. It’s part and parcel of being in business. And they accept it ain’t going away.

But they do have issues with the provisional tax system in its current condition.

Occasionally they feel the whole thing isn’t conducive to helping their small business grow. After all, having to pay tax even though they have not earned a single cent can certainly be a kick in the ribs.

But that is a consequence of Inland Revenue’s (IR) inflexible payment dates. Pay up – or pay the price.

If this sounds familiar, grab a pew and lend them an ear. Marc and Lee are about to detail how paying provisional tax with TMNZ enables Walker & Co Real Estate to remedy this problem.

Introducing Walker & Co Real Estate

To understand their perspective on provisional tax, one must understand more about their business.

They own and operate Walker & Co Real Estate. It’s a boutique agency in Upper Hutt. Warm and welcoming, it’s the type of place that caters to all walks of life. There’s always a cuppa on hand as they converse with buyers and sellers to deliver the best outcome. It certainly has that homely feel.

Collectively, Marc and Lee bring nigh on 20 years’ experience within the industry. So, they know what’s what. Five of those have been spent running Walker & Co Real Estate.

Like any business, there are peaks and valleys. There are sales aplenty in spring and Christmas. In winter, business chills a little.

That seasonality affects Walker & Co Real Estate. When cash is in short supply, Marc says it can be tough getting things like marketing and advertising squared away.

Adds Lee: “Obviously when your commissions come in there’s good money. However, you’ve got to sell a property before you get the cash coming in. So cashflow is definitely…very difficult.”

 

Image: Walker & Co Real Estate pay provisional tax with TMNZ.

Provisional tax can hinder business growth

And the last thing Walker & Co Real Estate wants to do is hand over money to IR when things are tight.

That puts the kybosh on their business plans as they are having to use the funds they need to operate or would invest elsewhere to cover it.

That, in turn, does not help them earn the do-re-mi.

Why Walker & Co Real Estate uses TMNZ

As they prefer to keep money in their business, Walker & Co Real Estate chooses to pay its provisional tax with TMNZ. This allows them to make their payments when it suits their business cashflow.

“Having the resource to put into your business is very important,” says Marc.

“Growth is important and if you take resources away from companies like us, our growth gets stagnant a little bit and it takes longer to get traction. To not worry about [provisional tax], it certainly helps us grow.”

Lee agrees. “It takes away all those stresses. You’re passing it on to somebody else and saying ‘take care of this for me, I don’t know what to do, we’ve got a shortage of cashflow’ and it’s the best way of putting more energy into your business and doing the things that you’re good at.”

All that peace of mind costs the pair is TMNZ’s interest, which is much cheaper than the usurious interest IR charges. Not a bad trade-off for greater flexibility. No nasty late payment penalties either.

Lee says everything was easy to set up. Forget about phoning IR and, providing you can get through to someone, facing an “interrogation” from its staff.

“[TMNZ are] there to help you – and they know their stuff.

“If you are unsure of anything at all, they will answer everything in a way that you can understand it. The everyday person, because there’s accountant language and everyday person language and they put it in a way that you can understand it as an individual or a company.”

 

Image: Walker & Co Real Estate logo
Photos: Colin McDiarmid.

Just give it a try

Marc reckons other business owners should give serious thought to using TMNZ.

“You solve a problem for a lot of businesses,” he says.

“I talk with a lot of business owners and we’re all the same – there’s a certain month in the year that you need to get things squared away and this from my point of view would certainly help them.”

Lee is much more effusive in her praise.

“Every time you have got that payment coming up you know you can give them a call and they will have it sorted for you. When you use the professionals and they do a job and do it well, leave it to them.

“Try it for a couple of years and see how you go. You’ll never turn back and will use them every time.”


Image: Auckland Sky Tower

TMNZ stepping up for Leukaemia & Blood Cancer New Zealand

Image: Auckland Sky Tower

TMNZ staff are raising money for Leukaemia & Blood Cancer New Zealand by racing up the tallest building in the Southern Hemisphere next month.

Grace Evetts, Mara Fisher, Neil Bhattacharya, Jatin Sharma and Lee Stace – collectively known as the ‘TMNZ Fast Five’ – are participating in this year’s Step Up Sky Tower Stair Challenge on 9 August.

They will join other teams from across New Zealand in racing up the 1103-step Auckland Sky Tower . The structure stands an impressive 328m and is 51 floors.

The money TMNZ raises will help Leukaemia & Blood Cancer New Zealand pay for patient support, research, information and advocacy.

Image: Leukaemia & Blood Cancer New Zealand logo.

About Leukaemia & Blood Cancer New Zealand

Leukaemia & Blood Cancer New Zealand is the national charity that supports patients and their families.

Blood cancers combined are the fifth most common form of cancer in New Zealand. An estimated 21,000 people live with blood cancer or a related condition.

In fact, six children and adults in New Zealand are diagnosed with a blood cancer like leukaemia, lymphoma and myeloma every day.

Despite doing such fantastic work, Leukaemia & Blood Cancer New Zealand receives no government funding.

The Step Up Sky Tower Stair Challenge is a key fundraiser for this organisation. That's why TMNZ staff are exercising their social responsibility by competing in this event.

How you can help

If you wish to sponsor one of the individual team members or donate directly to the team, you can do so here.

The TMNZ Fast Five are training hard to ensure they are fit and strong enough to tackle the Step Up Sky Tower Stair Challenge.

However, they cannot raise much-needed funds for Leukaemia & Blood Cancer New Zealand without the generosity of others.

They will appreciate any donations, so please give whatever you can.

And remember, anyone who makes a donation of $5 or more is eligible to receive a 33.33 percent tax credit or rebate from IRD.


First year of trading and provisional tax

What are a taxpayer’s provisional tax obligations in their first year of trading?

This is a question we receive a lot. In fact, there is certainly a lot of confusion out there.

As most know, their first year of trading is not tax-free. However, when income tax is due and payable depends on a taxpayer’s residual income tax (RIT) for the year and if they are a 'new provisional taxpayer'.

So, with that in mind, we explain below how the provisional tax rules work for the 2018 tax year onwards.

First year of trading: RIT is less than $60,000

Any income tax due for the year is due on your terminal tax date.

Interest will apply from this date if a taxpayer does not pay by then.

However, if the RIT is more than $5000 in their first year of trading, they will be a provisional taxpayer for the following year.

First year of trading: RIT is $60,000 or more

Inland Revenue (IR) may charge interest if you fall into the ‘new provisional taxpayer’ category.

The new provisional taxpayer criteria are different for individuals and companies/trusts.

Individuals are a new provisional taxpayer if:

  • Their RIT for that tax year is $60,000 or more
  • Their RIT in each of the four previous tax years was $5000 or less
  • They stopped receiving income from employment and started to receive income from a taxable activity during that tax year.

Companies/trusts are a new provisional taxpayer if:

  • Their RIT for that tax year is $60,000 or more
  • They did not receive taxable income from a taxable activity in any of the four previous years
  • They started receiving income from a taxable activity during that tax year.

Please take note of the different criteria for individuals and companies/trusts. This catches taxpayers out.

It is important to mention the term 'taxable activity' has the same meaning as it does in section 6 Goods and Services Tax Act 1985. However, for the purposes of provisional tax, the exclusion in the Act pertaining to GST-exempt supplies does not apply.

As such, determining if you are a new provisional taxpayer can be tricky in some instances.

From what instalment(s) will IR charge interest for new provisional taxpayers?

IR may charge interest (see the current rate here) on the number of provisional tax payments a taxpayer could have made during the first year of trading if you meet the new provisional taxpayer criteria.

Of course, that number depends on the date on which their business starts trading.

For someone with a 31 March balance date, refer to the table below.

If a taxpayer’s first year of trading starts… Then the number of provisional tax instalments payable is…
Before 29 July Three (28 Aug, 15 Jan and 7 May)
On/after 29 July but before 16 December Two (15 Jan and 7 May)
On 16 December or any time after that One (7 May)

These dates will differ if your balance date isn't 31 March or you file GST returns on a six-monthly basis.

The amount due at each provisional tax instalment

So, what happens if you meet the new provisional taxpayer criteria in your first year of trading?

Well, put simply, IR will divide your RIT for the year by the number of instalments you were liable to pay per the table above.

For instance, say your business starts trading on 1 October and your RIT for the year was $69,000.

IR will charge interest from two provisional tax dates: 15 January and 7 May. The amount on which interest will accrue at each date will be $34,500.

On the positive side, late payment penalties will not apply.

Reducing exposure to IR interest

Taxpayers may wish to make provisional tax payments in their first year of trading to mitigate their exposure to IR interest if they expect their RIT is going to be $60,000 or more.

If they are an individual or a partner in a partnership and meet certain criteria, they may also get an early payment discount of 6.7 percent on these payments.

TMNZ’s Flexitax lets you reduce the IR interest cost on the tax owing by a significant amount.

This is done by applying surplus tax paid to IR on the date it was originally due against your liability. IR treats this as if you paid on time, eliminating any interest and late payment penalties incurred.

 

This article has been written in general terms only. You should not rely upon this to provide specific information without also obtaining appropriate professional advice after detailed examination of your situation.